Investigation of the Suitability of a Pipe Stock Site in Terms of Geotechnical Characterization and Engineering Design Parameters Considering the Economic Aspects

Abstract

Geotechnical investigations are generally site specific and the parameters variate spatially and sometimes temporally due to the meteorological events and earth dynamics. In this study, the suitability of an inert area to utilize for a pipe stock site under a natural gas pipeline project considering the economic yield. Within the context of this study, office works and field works are performed. Geotechnical data are collected with the field works in order to assess sub-surface conditions prevailing under the proposed loads or pipe batch structures. Under field works, drilling operations, in –situ testing are performed. Assessment of the collected sub-surface data and its interpretation are realized within the office works. In other respects, rentability is one of the main parameter controlling the feasibility of the project in engineering. In this study, bearing capacity of the soil profile and the liquefaction potential of the investigated area are enlighten and the suitability of the study area for the project is evaluated comparing with the different alternatives of soil remediation techniques with the consideration of their costs. As a result of this study it is revealed that the soil remediation costs are much more than port storage renting fees.

Keywords:

Bearing capacity; Liquefaction analysis; Geotechnical investigations

DOI: 10.17350/HJSE19030000087

Full Text: page_white_acrobat.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Phoon, K.K. and Kulhawy, F.H., 1999. Characterisation of geotechnical variability. Can. Geotech. J. 36, 612-624.

2. Bowles, J.E., 1996. Foundation analysis and design, fifth ed. McGraw – Hillbook Co.

3. Fenton, G.A. and Griffiths, D.V., 2003. Bearing capacity prediction of spatially random c- Φ soils. Can. Geotech. J. 40(1), 54-65.

4. Griffiths, D.V. and Fenton, G.A., 2001. Bearing capacity prediction of spatially random soil: the undrained clay Prandtl problem revisited. Géotechnique 54 (4), 351-359.

5. Huang A.B. and Mayne, P.W., 2008. In: Huang Mayne (Eds.), Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterisation. Taylor and Francis Group, London. ISBN:978-0-415-46936-4.

6. Jaksa, M.B., Brooker, P.I. and Kaggwa, W.S., 1997. Inaccuracies associated with estimating random measurement errors. ASCE J. Geotech. Geoenv. Eng. 123 (5), 393-401.

7. Vanmarcke, E.H., 1977. Probabilistic modelling of soil profiles. ASCE J. Geotech. Eng. 103 (11), 1227-1246.

8. National Mapping Agency of Turkey, 1999. 1/25000 scaled Hatay O36-d3 topographical map.

9. Tekeli, O. and Erendil, M., 1985. Kızıldağ ofiyolitinin (Hatay) jeoloji ve petrolojisi. MTA Dergisi. 33-48.

10. Barka, A. and Reilinger, R., 1997. Active tectonics of the Eastern Mediterranean region: deduced from GPS,
neotectonic and seismicity data. Annali Di Geofizika. XL (3), 587-610.
Published
2018-04-06
How to Cite
Canoğlu, M. (2018). Investigation of the Suitability of a Pipe Stock Site in Terms of Geotechnical Characterization and Engineering Design Parameters Considering the Economic Aspects. Hittite Journal of Science & Engineering, 5(2), 147-154. Retrieved from https://www.hjse.hitit.edu.tr/hjse/index.php/HJSE/article/view/HJSE19030000087
Section
ENGINEERING